Web of Science ResearcherID JWP-2948-2024 https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7201-645X
WOS:000353769900038 https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000353769900038
https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000353769900038; Web of Science ResearcherIDJWP-2948-2024 https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7201-645X,
THE CRIMEAN CRISIS, NATIONAL IDENTITY AND TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY. MOSCOW’S AND BRUSSELS’ ARGUMENTS IN 2014 , DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15712084, p.330-339, in vol Globalization and intercultural dialogue: multidisciplinary perspectives / ed.: Iulian Boldea - Tîrgu-Mureş: Arhipelag XXI Press, 2014 ISBN 978-606-93691-3-5.
THE CRIMEAN CRISIS, NATIONAL IDENTITY AND TERRITORIAL
INTEGRITY. MOSCOW’S AND BRUSSELS’ ARGUMENTS IN 2014
Maria Costea, Researcher, PhD, ”Gh. Șincai Institute” for Social Sciences and
Humanities of the Romanian Academy
Abstract: The Crimean crisis has highlighted the complexity of issues such as national identity, self
determination of peoples, territorial integrity and great powers’ politics in the global context. On
March 21, 2014 Vladimir Putin signed the decree of annexation of Crimea to Russia. He invoked the
right to self-determination of peoples and the Russian historical right. Putin's popularity in Russia has
risen despite of the international sanctions imposed. The EU and USA defend the principle of the
territorial integrity of Ukraine.
Keywords: national identity, globalization, Crimea, integrity, self-determination
This contribution is a full chapter/article published in an edited conference proceedings volume (book with ISBN), indexed in the Web of Science Conference Proceedings Citation Index.
CITED BY:
Significant events are frequently followed by discussions about the event's true nature'. Yet, there is only little evidence whether the conspiratorial reasoning of conspiracy believers and sceptics is a priori determined, or if certain characteristics of information are responsible for provoking a polarization. We investigated how depicted causation (direct vs. indirect; Study 1) and intention (strong vs. weak purposeful; Study 2) might invoke a bias in believers and sceptics regarding conspiratorial reasoning about an ongoing event, namely, whether US investigations against FIFA were more or less likely to be seen as a conspiracy against Russia to sabotage the football World Cup in 2018. We revealed that judgments of conspiracy believers and sceptics about the event's true nature' are not a priori dividedin fact, conspiracy formation is only affected when direct causation or strong purposeful intentions were obvious. Results point to the relevance of conspiratorial predispositions and semantic cues in conspiracy formation. Copyright (c) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Publication Date: 2014