This article presents a critical-propositional analysis of Trama Epistemológica: Entretecendo o Conhecimento Científico, by Carlos Henrique Barbosa Rozeira, Carlos Felipe Barbosa Rozeira, and Marcos Fernandes da Silva, published on Zenodo under DOI https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10002060, in dialogue with the Theory of Objectivity (TO).
The study examines the article’s treatment of scientific method, epistemology, subjectivity, methodological plurality, interdisciplinarity, and complexity. It argues that the analyzed text does not offer a cosmological model, a modal demonstration, or an empirical test directly applicable to TO. Nevertheless, it provides relevant epistemological support for the TO research program, especially by clarifying how broad, non-conventional, and interdisciplinary theories may be formulated, evaluated, criticized, and communicated.
The analysis identifies strong compatibility between the article and TO in the fields of complexity, methodological openness, interdisciplinarity, and the relational understanding of knowledge. At the same time, it highlights important tensions: while the analyzed article emphasizes flexibility, subjectivity, and plurality, TO requires modal necessity, logical coherence, ontological discipline, and operational testability.
The article concludes that Trama Epistemológica may function as an indirect epistemological contribution to the Theory of Objectivity, provided that methodological openness remains subordinated to modal discipline and to the construction of empirical bridges.
This analytical study was developed with analytical support from ChatGPT.
Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; Vidamor Cabannas; Denivaldo Silva; epistemology; scientific method; methodological plurality; subjectivity; complexity; interdisciplinarity; modal discipline; scientific knowledge; Inducer Effects; phenomenic elements; transcendent knowledge; ChatGPT-assisted analysis.
Publication Date: 2026-06-20